php gettext and poedit - What would be faster using constructor or without -


i store attributes , options in class attributes.

public static $ethnicity = array(0 => '-', 1 => 'asian', 2 => 'black / african descent', 3 => 'east indian', 4 => 'latino / hispanic', 5 => 'middle eastern', 6 => 'native american', 7 => 'pacific islander', 8 => 'white / caucasian', 9 => 'other');

why keep them in code , not db story. have problem poedit because can not read dynamic translations. have 2 options:

a) put array values 1 single dump file. file used poedit parser:

_('asian'), _('black / african descent'), ...

in way can call translations in view in following way:

echo _(attributes::$ethnicity[3]));

b) can use constructor , call gettext there.

class attributes { public function __construct() { $this->ethnicity = array(0 => _('-'), 1 => _('asian'), 2 => _('black / african descent'), 3 => _('east indian'), 4 => _('latino / hispanic'), 5 => _('middle eastern'), 6 => _('native american'), 7 => _('pacific islander'), 8 => _('white / caucasian'), 9 => _('other')); //... } }

in way can call translations in view in following way:

$attr = new attributes; echo $attr->ethnicity[3];

now questions:

let's there 10 attributes , on average 40 options, 400 array pairs. using construct in way slow application @ way? because mean everytime call constructor, gettext called array values, if attribute value not displayed in view. if don't use constructor, gettext called single attributes values used.

i did ab test, surprised because there weren't difference. worried must missing sense calling constructor in way make slowing.

i stick solution b it's cleaner , after few months still know $attr->ethnicity[3]; does.

if still unsure, try stress test - try call constructor many times. humble opinion there no significant difference. if don't need call many times in live application. gettext designed fast.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

JQuery Autocomplete without using label, value, id -

is possible have jquery autocomplete work without using conventional id,label,value? for instance, not wish use: [ { "id": "botaurus stellaris", "label": "great bittern", "value": "great bittern" }, { "id": "asio flammeus", "label": "short-eared owl", "value": "short-eared owl" }] but rather: [ { "my_id": "botaurus stellaris", "first_name": "great bittern", "last_name": "great bittern" }, { "my_id": "asio flammeus", "first_name": "short-eared owl", "last_name": "short-eared owl" }] so like, jquery autocomplete takes id,value,label , can make take my_id, first_name, last_name , make jquery autocomplete treat same id,label,value ? this might useful, when don't wish modify data's keys coming datasource, display on jquery autocomplete. ...
Read more

c++ - Accessing inactive union member and undefined behavior? -

i under impression accessing union member other last 1 set ub, can't seem find solid reference (other answers claiming it's ub without support standard). so, undefined behavior? the confusion c explicitly permits type-punning through union, whereas c++ ( c++11 ) has no such permission. c11 6.5.2.3 structure , union members 95) if member used read contents of union object not same member last used store value in object, appropriate part of object representation of value reinterpreted object representation in new type described in 6.2.6 (a process called ‘‘type punning’’). might trap representation. the situation c++: c++11 9.5 unions [class.union] in union, @ 1 of non-static data members can active @ time, is, value of @ 1 of non-static data members can stored in union @ time. c++ later has language permitting use of unions containing struct s common initial sequences; doesn't permit type-punning. to determine whether union type-punning is allowe...
Read more

JAVA - what is the difference between void and boolean methods? -

i new java. writing wrapper-library in java make functions available in basic-like language. i got stock @ point when noted code not executed in java-library although compiler did not complain (using eclipse). resolved replacing code follows: public void videoquality(int vquality) //did not work into public boolean videoquality(int vquality) //works here complete code-snippets: public void videoquality(int vquality) //did not work {if (vquality==16) { vidquality=16; } else if (vquality==-16) { vidquality=-16; } else if (vquality==0) { vidquality=0; } else vidquality=-16; vitamioext.setvideoquality(vidquality); } public boolean videoquality(int vquality) //works {if (vquality==16) { vidquality=16; } else if (vquality==-16) { vidquality=-16; } else if (vquality==0) { vidquality=0; } else vidquality=-16; vitamioext.setvideoquality(vidquality); return true; } i think void corresponds sub in visual basic while boolean corresponds function. i found odd following code worked using...
Read more